Pro-Aborts on the Armageddon Path
Pro-aborts are exulting in last week’s victory in putting one of their own baby killers on the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Politico:
Conservatives are finding out the hard way that abortion isn’t a 50-50 issue anymore.
Janet Protasiewicz’s 11-point blowout victory this week for a state Supreme Court seat in Wisconsin was just the latest example of voters who support abortion rights outnumbering — and outvoting — their opponents.
That’s not what happened. Typical media manipulation. What happened is the pro-aborts have dominated everything for 50 years: the courts, the politics, both parties (GOP pathetically weak), the universities, the K-12 schools, even the Christian religions (mostly) – everything. It isn’t “50-50,” but more like 90-10, with pro-lifers getting an occasional victory, but mostly losing, as in the Badger State.
Pro-lifers just got a slight advantage with last year’s Supreme Court decision from two things. First, in the more conservative states, especially in the South, they worked hard to pass laws to be test cases to bring before the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping a pro-life president would appoint pro-lifers to the court. Second, President Trump promised pro-lifers to do just that if they supported him. They provided crucial support behind his 2016 victory. He kept his promise.
Yeah, I know Trump is flawed in so many ways. But here’s the record of recent presidents on appointing pro-life justices to the court:
· Nixon: 2 pro-aborts, 2 pro-life.
· Ford: 1 pro-abort.
· Reagan: 2 pro-aborts, 1 pro-life.
· GHW Bush: 1 pro-abort, 1 pro-life.
· W Bush: 1 pro-abort, 1 pro-life.
· Trump: 3 pro-life.
Throw in this: Trump would not have put us at risk for nuclear Armageddon over in the Ukraine War. That’s why he’s the most pro-life president in recent history. By far. No wonder the Left is trying to lynch him. They’re salivating at keeping Biden in place, or ditching him for Newsom, so they can replace the aging Justices Thomas (74) and Alito (73) with pro-aborts who will bring back Roe v. Wade. They’ll probably succeed.
Political pundits say Republicans need to “moderate” on abortion. But they would lose 30% of their support. It’s going to be difficult for them to win no matter whom they nominate in 2024, 2028 and beyond. The schools have brainwashed the youngsters to be pro-aborts and pro-Democrat.
Newsom is traveling to Red States to brag about all the babies he’s killing in California, and instructing local Democrats on how to beat Republicans. Having watched him now for 23 years, it’s obvious he’s a savvy politician. The deaths of millions of little babies advance his political career. And winning the White House is all that matters in life, isn’t it?
The irony is, if there really is a nuclear war – which could happen, seriously – it’s the Blue Cities (Democrats) that most would be wiped out. The Red Cities are smaller and in the rural areas that would survive. That’s because the big Blue Cities have the defense industries and often are near military bases. Orange County, where I live, now has a 3-2 Democrat majority on the Board of Supervisors. It includes Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach and is north of Camp Pendleton. It’s not clear if Seal Beach now has nukes that could be flung at Moscow. But they definitely did back in 1982. The Russians wouldn’t take any chances.
Locally, we also have numerous defense companies. And, “Aerospace companies have leased roughly 23 million square feet in Los Angeles, including 3.3 million square feet that have been leased since 2015, according to data from CBRE Group Inc.” Aerospace means not only nice communications satellites and commercial jetliners, but missiles and bombers loaded with nukes. L.A. now is almost an entirely Democrat area.
So if there’s a nuclear war, the surviving mostly Red voters would be pro-life. Especially as they would want to replace the millions of dead with spanking new babies.
T.S. Eliot famously wrote in “The Hollow Men,” 100 years old in 2025:
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.
But what if the poet was wrong, and it ends with a bang – soon?